A Fundamental
Basis For A New Relativistic Mechanics
Autodynamics provides physicists with working
quantum models not just for subatomic interactions
but also for universal gravitation. Unlike Special
Relativity, the Autodynamics thesis does not need a vicarious particle.
Nor does it need the notion of space-time dilation and yet it utilizes
the two postulates of relativity. AD is based on readily available scientific
data and rigorous logic. It is here in this web site set out for readers
to evaluate for themselves.
AD equations preserve
the principle of conservation of energy in atomic decay processes, whereas
Special Relativity's do not. SR needed to fabricate the concept of the
neutrino to rationalize the excess theoretical momentum inherent in
its equations. More than half a century of national and international
efforts have failed to find this particle which its inventor called
'a desperate remedy'. The acceptance of this fabrication means that
whenever a new decay process is discovered, SR has to postulate a new
type of neutrino. This strategy is further problematical for SR, as
Carezani has shown that in other scenarios external vectors account
for some of the missing energy. AD does not have this problem.
AD equations are
supported by experiment. Some examples are,
Atomic decay
Electron-K
capture
Linear
momentum transfer in Nuclear-Nuclear collisions
Proton-Anti-proton
annihilation
Electron-Positron
annihilation
Unlike SR, AD is
not restricted to the one dimensional explanation of a photon striking
an electron but is able to postulate a more dimensionally sophisticated
model based on energy-absorption and mass-decay. The AD Kinetic Energy
equation has improved upon the generally accepted equation for Compton
Scattering. This has been verified by peer group review, (Physics
Essays volume 4, number 1, 1991). Where SR postulates a particle
because it needs to, AD postulates a particle because it is able to.
In 1990 Carezani predicted a new particle, which he dubbed the electromuon.
In 1994, physicists at the Karmen collaboration detected what appears
to be this new particle. In the case of atomic decay, Carezani has proposed
a new radium experiment, published in Physics Essays
(1988). Subsequent research has, however, uncovered an experiment by
MIT scientists Buechner and Van Der Graaf Physics Review (1946). It
concurs with Carezani's AD thesis in that it too eliminates the need
for the neutrino, or any vicarious particle.
General Relativity attempts to describe the force of gravity but lacking
a mechanism it resorts to notions of space-time dilation and gravity
being inherent to matter. It uses Gerber’s equation to calculate perihelion
advance of Mercury. Autodynamics has developed the Le Sage Ultramundane
Corpuscle (referred to as a Pico-Graviton) by calculating
mass increase due to Pico-Graviton absorption. This simple step has
yielded nothing less than a veritable working quantum model
for universal gravitation; a mechanistic explanation for the,
Pioneer Anomaly
Luna
Distancing
Allais Anomaly
Binary Star Precession
Perihelion Advance
and
Why the planets go around
the stars.
Carezani has
resolved a paradigm that once occupied Newton, Le Sage and De Broglie
and shown that gravity, most certainly, need not be inherent to matter.
The AD paradigm
is based on a graviton substratum that is consistent with observations
being made at both quantum and cosmological scales.
AD accepts the apparent
paradox of a perpetual and self-energizing universe (hence the epithet
of Autodynamics). This leads it to take entropy as
constant amid a cyclic process of energy absorption and mass decay.
It does not need the big bang or expanding universe to arrive at its
successes. It sees no reason for a universal speed limit attributed
to light by SR.
Franco Carrieri
info@autodynamicsuk.org
webmaster@autodynamicsuk.org