| |
|
Formal Mathematical Derivations for Autodynamics
As with
many powerful yet elegant theories, the derivation is often the most powerful
argument for the theory itself. Such is the case with Autodynamics. Although
it is impossible to discuss the background necessary to adequately set
up the AD derivation in this small article, the math is quite simple and
elegant.
|
The Derivations |
|
Galilean
Simplification
|
Carezani examines two parallel frames of coordinates
x, y, z, t and x', y', z', t'. Frame F is moving with relative
velocity v with respect to frame F '. He uses the Galilean
transformation.
|
|
Frames
Derivation
|
Discussing in detail the Galilean coordinate transformation
principle and comparing it with the Lorentz-Einstein transformation
of frames in relative motion, the author of AD demonstrated
that it is possible to simplify the Lorentz equations by recognizing
that one of the two coordinate systems used by Lorentz and
Einstein were superfluous.
|
|
Other Frame Stuff |
|
Lorentz
Math Right, Physically Wrong
|
Although mathematically correct, Lorentz's equations
make no physical sense. See the Carezani explanation inspired
by his conversations with Herman Leonard, one of the great
portrait photographers of our times.
|
|
Systems
in Relative Motion
|
An issue that confounds new students of AD is
the velocity SUM equation, because of their entrenched SR
mind set. They firmly believe the SR thesis regarding "systems in relative motion."
|
|
|