To Sustain the Unsustainable*
(Cesium Experiment)

To illustrate the psychological pressure on current thinking and the historical resistance to new theories, we comment (C) on some statements from the FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) referenced in *.

It seems to me that the authors take an analogous position to Galileo, regarding the possibility of SR being wrong. When forced to renounce his convictions, he stamped the floor whispering "E pour se move" (And nevertheless it moves). If they don't accept the current situation, the doors may be closed to further experiments.

Q. "How to interpret it in an intuitive way?"

A. "No intuitive way to explain this observed effect precisely can be found because the "specially prepared" atomic cell is in a state that does not exist naturally."

C. "Does not exist naturally." This statement is "naturally" irrelevant. Humans are a product of NATURE. All that Humans manufacture or produce exists naturally.

The classification of "anomalous" or "normal" phenomenon is totally arbitrary and nonsensical. It is a simple question of knowledge. It is a simple question of technology. It is a simple question of information. Fiber optics were "anomalous" at first, but today they make sense; they are part of daily life!

"Q. Is Einstein's Relativity violated?"

"A. Our experiment is not at odds with Einstein's special relativity. The experiment can be well explained using existing physics theories that are consistent with Relativity. In fact the experiment was designed based on calculations using existing physics theories.

However, our experiment does show that the generally held misconception "nothing can move faster than the speed of light" is wrong. The statement only applies to objects with a rest mass. Light can be viewed as waves and has no mass. Therefore, it is not limited by its speed inside a vacuum.

Information code using a light pulse cannot be transmitted faster than c using this effect. Hence, it is still true to say that "Information carried by a light pulse cannot be transmitted faster than c." The detailed reasons are very complex and are still under debate. However, using this effect, one might be able to increase information transfer speed up to c. In present day technology, information is transmitted at speeds far slower than c in most cases such as through the Internet and inside a computer."

C. "Light can be viewed as waves and has no mass," but light can also be viewed as a particle or corpuscle, given the dual interpretation of light as proved by Einstein's Photoelectric Effect, where all particles have mass. Contrarily, the wave cannot exist because the Ether doesn't exist, as was proved by the Michelson-Morley experiment.

In the particular case of Cesium, where "we drove almost all cesium atoms to only one of the 16 possible quantum mechanical states……" it is possible that other carriers transmit the information 300 times faster than light (e.g., Autodynamics'** Pico-Graviton as a cause of Gravitation) in a similar action related to "entangled photons" in the experiment by Nicolas Gisin*** et al., at the University of Geneva. In this experiment, changing a photon's quality, the "entangled photon", at 10 kilometers distance, changes the same quality apparently simultaneously. It is evident that some information is transmitted at superluminal velocity between those two photons.

"Information carried by a light pulse cannot be transmitted faster than c." The detailed reasons are very complex and are still under debate."

Everything that we said regarding Galileo is confirmed by this statement.

It is not true, regarding the Cesium Experiment, that information cannot be transmitted faster than light. It is a question of technology. So far, this is a "very simple technology."

All computers use the binary system where a "signal" or "absence of signal" transmits infinite information.

Manufacturing a cable that has 8, 16, etc., micro-tubes filled with Cesium gas and a device that repeats the experimental setup, any information can be transmitted through a binary system as a snapshot or pulse!

AD ends the "debate", showing that SR is erroneous and that superluminal velocity is not only possible **** but that it really exists in Nature in the Stellar JETs*****

To try to support SR is to try to support something in vain, because Autodynamics proves without any doubt that SR is erroneous.

R. L. Carezani.
August 2000.

Reference

*.- L. Wang, A. Dogariu and A. Kuzmich, "Gain-Assisted Superluminal Light Propagation," at http://www.neci.nj.nec.com/homepages/lwan/gas.htm
**.- R. L. Carezani, Autodynamics, Fundamental Basis for a New Relativistic Mechanics, SAA, 801 Pine Ave. # 211, Long Beach, CA 90813, USA LCCCN 98-86262 and ISBN 0-9665533-1-4 or at http://www.autodynamics.org
***.- Mark Buchanan, "Light's spooky connections set distance record." New Scientist, 28 June 1997
****.- AD's Superluminic Velocity Derivation, at http://www.autodynamics.org
*****.- R. C. Vermuelen and M. H. Cohen, "Superluminal Motion and Cosmology." The Astrophysical journal, 430:467-494, 1994, August 1. In Table 1, a Compilation of Internal Proper Motion, list 66 extragalactic sources with multiepoch observation with a maximum at 26 c.