|
EXPERIMENTS: Radium E
Forward
This
excerpt was taken from an unpublished paper written during my first encounters
with Autodynamics. Even though I wrote this quite some time ago, some
readers may find the simple level of explanation helpful in understanding
the original and new Radium E experiments.
by
David de Hilster
Searching
For Proof
Because
special relativity is good enough to describe most cases in today's physical
world, it is easy to understand why no one has questioned Einstein's equations.
Einstein's equations are not useless. They have been corroborated by many
experimental results. In fact, all physics theories are still useful today
within well-defined frameworks. Newton's classical equations still are
used in with great success in space, military, and transport industries
with spectacular results. Space probes pass within kilometers of their
target millions of miles from the earth without ever using Einstein's
equations. Einstein's equations work perfectly well for particle accelerators
(atom smashers) and electromagnetic fields.
Ricardo
began the difficult work of finding an experiment that Autodynamics could
explain and special relativity could not. During his years in Argentina,
he spent his weekends in university libraries pouring over experiments
that erroneously applied special relativity equations to decay cases.
In 1952, he finally found what he was looking for: the Radium E (RaE)
experiment.
In
1927, two physicists, C. D. Ellis and W. A. Wooster, set out to measure
the energy given off by Radium E decaying into Polonium. The experiment
was simple: place the most pure form or RaE available at the time into
a calorimeter and measure the output. Beta decay was well understood at
the time: each RaE atom naturally decays into one electron and one proton.
The electron is emitted at a high velocity and the proton is recaptured
by the atom to become a Polonium atom. The half life of this process is
five days, meaning, it takes 5 days for half of any amount of RaE to transform
into Polonium.
Electrons
in the inner-most part of the RaE sample collide into other atoms on their
journey to the surface. Since the number of atoms in the sample is also
known, Ellis and Wooster only had to measure the heat given off by the
Radium E sample to discover the amount of energy emitted in the process
of decay. From experimental results, they calculated that each RaE atom
naturally emits 0.36 MeV: exactly equivalent to the energy of one electron.
It
is important to remember that Ellis and Wooster were not interested in
confirming or refuting special relativity. They did not use Einstein's
equations in their calculations. They were only interested in discovering
the total amount of energy generated in the experiment. Once the experiment
was performed, they moved on to other research.
During
the next few years, other physicists carried out numerous related experiments,
more or less confirming Ellis and Wooster's initial findings. Several
of the physicists performing similar experiments used a mass spectrograph
to measure the velocity of the Radium E emitted electrons allowing them
to apply Einstein's special relativity equation to calculate the total
energy. In 1931, Viennese physicist Wolfgang Pauli, a strong proponent
of Einstein's latest theory, compared these later studies to the original
Ellis and Wooster experiment and noticed a discrepancy. From Einstein's
equations, Pauli saw that each Radium atom should emit 1.16 MeV: almost
3 times what was measured by Ellis and Wooster's experiment.
Believing
whole-heartedly in special relativity's equations, Pauli could only assume
that 0.8 MeV was real and had to be accounted for in order to agree with
Einstein's theory. In December 1930, Pauli, wrote a letter to Hans Geiger
and Lise Meitner suggesting a new "massless", "chargeless" particle for
explaining the discrepancy which carried away energy without detection.
Pauli died soon after. A few years later, a contemporary, Enrico Fermi,
tried to publish Pauli's theory of the new particle which Fermi named
the "neutrino" in the English magazine, Nature. It was rejected as being
too speculative and fantastic to publish.
Postulating
an "invisible" particle which magically carries away energy without a
trace is quite a tale to tell in the land of physics. After all, no other
particle in the universe is so much "nothing" with exception of the photon
(which has momentum but no mass or charge and which is also continuously
debated). Yet during the earlier part of the 20th century, physicists
were abuzz with the fantastic stories of Einstein's relativistic world
where time, space, and mass flow and change as readily as waves in the
ocean. The universe turned out to be an even stranger place than anyone
had imagined yet there were many experiments which confirmed Einstein's
predictions. So why not the neutrino?
The Search Continues
Until
now, Dr. Carezani had yet to find any experimental evidence that proved
his theory. Even though there was indirect evidence (Autodynamics predicted
results that special relativity could not), no experiment he found directly
supported his theory.
Excited
with his first find, Ricardo continued to search for other experiments
and phenomena which Autodynamics could explain and special relativity
could not. Unfortunately, Ricardo, like many other post-war scientists,
lived in a repressive country run by a dictator making research very difficult.
Resources were scarce and Ricardo searched as best he could for the next
20 years, slowly realizing that he would have to try to look outside the
country with any means possible.
During
these years, Ricardo worked in dozens of professions, sometimes several
at once to survive. He investigated extracting germanium from a coal mine,
designed a vacuum cleaner and blast furnace, manufactured electric transformers,
TVs, stereos, and radios, and designed and installed a ceramics factory
to make furniture. Many of these businesses were his own and the hours
were long and grueling.
Through
all this, his continued searching scientific publications at Bs. As. University
library hoping to find proof for his theory.
In
1972, through hard work and some luck, Dr. Carezani got in touch with
Stanford University's Linear Accelerator Center in Palo Alto, California.
Ricardo set up a meeting between an engineer friend who was returning
to the San Francisco with on of the leading Theoretical Physicist at Stanford:
Dr. H. Pierre Noyes. The meeting finally took place in the first part
of 1974 and was not as fruitful as hoped. Ricardo's friend did not understand
the theory well enough to explain Ricardo's ideas and Dr. Noyes did not
have the time to try and understand.
Despite
the failed meeting, Ricardo got his foot in the door and began an intense
discussion by letter about his theory, decay experiments, and possible
publication of the Autodynamic Theory. Despite his great interest, Dr.
Noyes' lack of understanding Autodynamics fundamentals greatly contributed
to its failure to be accepted by fellow colleagues and therefore, published
in important journals.
During
these discussions, Peron's reign of terror was about to end with his impending
death and in 1979, Argentina suddenly but predictably opened its doors
to the world. Ricardo immediately began preparation to travel to California
for two months to meet directly with Dr. Noyes at Stanford. Speaking acceptable
English, his daughter would translate.
In the United States
The
first meetings with Dr. Noyes were cordial. Ricardo found out however
that two months time was not enough to explain or retrieve the needed
information for substantiating his new theory. He returned to Argentina
to tell his wife what she feared most: he must move to the United States.
So,
in 1981, a sixty-year-old Argentine physicist ventured alone to the United
States, leaving his wife temporarily behind to fight for a new theory
which he had discovered some forty years before.
Ricardo
got a job as a physicist and mathematician for a small company specializing
in mobile radio transmitters. This gave him the opportunity to invite
his daughter to spend winter vacation with him in San Rafael, just north
of San Francisco. Monica, now 18 years old, had always thought of studying
in the United States and found out that the local high School accepted
her school credentials from Argentina. She decided to move to the U.S.
with her father to continue her studies to become a doctor.
Dr.
Carezani continued his meetings with Dr. Noyes. They often lunched together
at Stanford, giving him the opportunity to meet other scientists. He also
began to see the political nature of science in the United States. Most
professors, including Dr. Noyes, worked extremely hard at building camps
of followers and shunned and often ridiculed any students or scientists
who opposed main stream ideas. This only lead Ricardo to greater frustration.
He had hoped that in the democratic air of the United States, that he
would find comrades in science and scientific thinking. What he found
were clashing egos, in-fighting, and self-appointed leaders.
Having
discovered that a famous physicist closed by who supposedly spoke Spanish,
Ricardo contacted Nobel Laureate, Dr. Luis Alvarez of Berkeley University.
Unfortunately, Dr. Alvarez did not speak Spanish, and the small mobile
radio company where Ricardo was working closed. Moving with his daughter
to Long Beach where she continued her medical studies, he correspond with
Dr. Alvarez by letter, Monica translating.
In
1952, along with his discovery of the RaE experiment, Ricardo had formulated
what he thought to be an experiment, which if performed, would support
his theory of Autodynamics. The experiment was carried out at Stanford.
The results however undoubtedly supported special relativity. Although
Dr. Noyes claimed that this was evidence against Autodynamics, Ricardo
re-examined the experimental setup and discovered that it could not have
produced the desired results as it was designed. The only way to support
Autodynamics predictions was to apply it to decay cases. This experiment
did not involve decay making it impossible to compare special relativity
and Autodynamics equations using the given experiment.
Recall
the cannon and the rocket. The Stanford experiment was a clear case of
external energy being applied to a system. What Ricardo needed was a more
concrete case of the decay/rocket example: mass converted to energy spontaneously.
Undaunted,
Ricardo worked for several years studying the results and trying to understand
them in the bigger picture of Autodynamics.
With
time, Ricardo eventually convinced Alvarez of the worth of his new experiment.
Without warning, after having accepted the validity of Ricardo's new experiment
to help support his theory, Dr. Alvarez ended his correspondence by saying
that he could not perform the experiment because he was 72 and 1/2 years
old and that this experiment would take years. This seemed very radical
to Ricardo since the new experiment would take only a few months to set
up and perform.
The New RaE Experiment
In
1984, Ricardo returned to the RaE experiment. He discovered an extremely
simple yet elegant way to alter the original experiment so that it would
decide once an for all whether Autodynamics or special relativity was
the correct relativistic theory in Physics.
In
the original 1927 experiment, Ellis and Wooster were only interested in
measuring the total energy output of RaE decay. Since then, similar experiments
have been carried out more than two dozen times with the same results1,
yet none of them went beyond the measuring of total energy. Pauli, the
father of the neutrino, also worked exclusively with the total energy
output of RaE decay. Ricardo realized it wasn't enough.
In
order to prove or disprove one theory or the other, Ricardo recognized
that more data points would have to be taken. Intermediate points would
have to be measured which would fall between zero and the total energy
measured in the original RaE experiment in order to plot the exact energy
curve. If the points fell on the predicted Autodynamic curve, Autodynamics
would prevail. If the points fell on the special relativity curve, special
relativity would prevail. There would be no in between.
In
the old experiment, the entire sample of RaE was placed within the calorimeter
giving no chance of measuring intermediate points. The trick which Ricardo
found was to remove the RaE sample from the calorimeter and direct electrons
of different velocities into the calorimeter. This is done by setting
up an electro-magnetic field and filtering out electrons traveling at
different speeds using a mass spectrograph.
Three
different velocities are judiciously chosen and plotted on the y-coordinate
with respect to energy. The results will either correspond with Autodynamics
or special relativity. And since the RaE sample is removed from the calorimeter,
the neutrino is in effect "taken out" of the equation. It comes down to
the two relativistic theories: Einstein versus Carezani.
The
points have been chosen. The table below waits for the results of the
new experiment to verify or dispute Dr. Carezani's theory of relativity.
The points are judiciously chosen so that the difference in expected results
is significant.
(predicted (predicted experimental experimental temperature) temperature)
Electron Velocity Autodynamics Special Relativity
0.8 c 4.6107o C 7.6845o C 0.9 c 3.2512o C 7.4588o C 0.94 c 0.5062o C 1.4839o C
1
In the original experiment, the pureness of the Radium sample was suspect
and with the advent of the modern Nuclear Reactor, more pure samples could
be used.
|